Wp(C) v. Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of
High Court
28 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C) v. Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of
Date of order
28 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C) v. Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5905 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONER:
M/s SREEVALSOM RESIDENCY,103A, 103B, 103C, MC ROAD, KALADY, ERNAKULAM - 686 574,REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SHRI. ARUN RAJ PILLAI
BY ADVS.SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFSRI.M.H.ASIF ALISMT.SHAIMA VAHAB
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTER CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM - 691 001
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - III28/243, “POORNIMA”, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN - 682 036
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON28.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of February, 2020
Heard Sri. S.Muhammed Haneef, the learned counsel forthe petitioner and Sri. Jose Joseph, the learned Standing Counsel forrespondents.
2.Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment dated01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected cases to contend
that the Division Bench directed disposal of appeal and granted stayof recovery proceedings during the pendency of the appeal.
3.The learned Standing Counsel admits that the facts of thecase are substantially same and similar to the facts noted by theDivision Bench in W.A. No.1536 of 2019, hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd] respondent to considerand dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner herein atthe earliest taking note of the Full Bench decision reported in The
WP(C).No.5905/2020(K)
v. Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner of
Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287] and to keep in abeyancerecovery proceedings and collection of tax assessed, pendingdisposal of such appeal.
Sd/-
S.V. BHATTI JUDGE
SR
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORAY - 2012-13 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE & COMPUTATION OF INCOME30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORAY - 2012-13 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE & COMPUTATION OF INCOME
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORAY - 2013-14 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE & COMPUTATION OF INCOME30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORAY - 2013-14 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE & COMPUTATION OF INCOME
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORAY - 2014-15 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE & COMPUTATION OF INCOME30.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORAY - 2014-15 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE & COMPUTATION OF INCOME
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED21.01.2020 FOR AY - 2012-13 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT21.01.2020 FOR AY - 2012-13 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED21.01.2020 FOR AY - 2013-14 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT21.01.2020 FOR AY - 2013-14 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED21.01.2020 FOR AY -2014-15 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT21.01.2020 FOR AY -2014-15 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2012-1301.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2012-13EXHIBIT P8TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2013-1401.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2013-14
EXHIBIT P9TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2014-1501.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2014-15
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED21.01.2020 FOR AY -2014-15 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT21.01.2020 FOR AY -2014-15 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2012-1301.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2012-13EXHIBIT P8TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2013-1401.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2013-14
EXHIBIT P9TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 01.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2014-1501.02.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY - 2014-15
SR //True Copy// PA to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.