Wp(C) v. Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of
High Court
28 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C) v. Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of
Date of order
28 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C) v. Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner Of, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.5958 OF 2020(T)
PETITIONER:
THE ARUVIKKARA FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.603,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ARUVIKKARA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 564
BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(3), OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 003
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 003
SRI. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON28.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of February, 2020
Heard Sri.T.R.Harikumar, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. Christopher Abraham, the learned StandingCounsel for respondents.
2.Petitioner refers to and relies on judgment dated01.07.2019 in W.A No.1536 of 2019 and connected cases to contend
that the Division Bench directed disposal of appeal and granted stayof recovery proceedings during the pendency of the appeal.
3.The learned Standing Counsel admits that the facts of thecase are substantially same and similar to the facts noted by theDivision Bench in W.A. No.1536 of 2019, hence can be followed.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ 2[nd] respondent to considerand dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner herein atthe earliest taking note of the Full Bench decision reported in The
WP(C).No.5958 OF 2020(T)
v. Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd, The Commissioner of
Income Tax, Calicut[2019 (2) KHC 287] and to keep in abeyancerecovery proceedings and collection of tax assessed, pendingdisposal of such appeal.
Sd/-
S.V. BHATTI JUDGE
SR
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THEYEAR 2017-2018 DATED 16-12-2019
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT DATED 16-12-2019
EXHIBIT P3A TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE APPEAL DATED 14-01-2020 FILED AGAINST EXT-P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER, BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXT P3 APPEAL DATED 12-02-2020
EXHIBIT P5A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19-07-2019 IN W.A NO. 1639 OF 2019EXHIBIT P6A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17-02-2020 IN WP(C) NO. 4433 OF 2020
SR //True copy// PA to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.