W.p.(Crl)/2134/2016 Of Niranjan Singh v. The Director Of Income Tax & Ors

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R D E R%25.07.2016 By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950,petitioner has prayed that the respondents (Income Tax Department) bedirected to investigate the matter in terms of the representation dated 27[th]June, 2011 and 29[th]January, 2016 of the petitioner. It may be noted thatpetitioner is a resident of Village Karkardooma.He alleged in therepresentation that one Shri Jagdish Singh was getting `2,00,000/- as rentfrom the property bearing no.301, Karkardooma Village, Delhi-110092 buthad not shown in his returns. He was evading tax. Further that Shri JagdishSingh was having another property bearing no.219, Village Karkardooma,Delhi and had spent about `20,00,000/- in the year 2011 to construct thesame. He was also getting rent of `40,000/- from the said property.Beside this, he was also having one House No.256, Village Karkardooma, Delhiand had spent about `20,00,000/- on its construction. He was generating rentfrom this property as well.Shri Jagdish Singh was owner of propertiesbearing nos.105 & 231, Village Karkardooma, Delhi, which have also notbeen disclosed to Income Tax Department.Although, certain documentshave been annexed which indicate that Income Tax Officer is ceased of thematter.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that status of theproceedings has not been apprised to the petitioner.In my view, writjurisdiction cannot be used by the petitioner to make fishing and rovingenquiry.I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition on the above facts. Writ petition is dismissed.Miscellaneous application is disposed ofas infructuous. A.K. PATHAK, J. JULY 25, 2016/dk