Case LawHigh Court › Wpl v. R.m.savant,Jj

Wpl v. R.m.savant,Jj

High Court 07 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wpl v. R.m.savant,Jj
Date of order
07 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wpl v. R.m.savant,Jj, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: 3This Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of the counsel for the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
lgc 1 WPL No.2710 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2710 OF 2010 Ingram Micro India Ltd.: Petitioner.versusThe Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax, Central Range-7, Mumbai and anr.: Respondents. Mr. J D Mistry, Sr. Counsel, a/w Mr. N C Thakkar i/by Mr. A K Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. P S Sahadevan for the Respondents. CORAM :- J.P.DEVADHAR & R.M.SAVANT,JJ. DATE :- 07[th] December 2010 P.C. Heard Perused Petition. 2The Petitioner has challenged the notice dated 22/11/2010 issued by the Assessing Officer whereunder the Assessing Officer has called upon the Petitioner to show cause as to why the Petitioner should not be treated as an agent of the Bermudian Company under Section 163 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The learned counsel for the Revenue states that the hearing of the said notice is being fixed today. He further states that the notice would be heard and disposed of after giving personal hearing to the Petitioner within a period of six weeks from today and if the order is adverse to the Petitioner the same would not be given effect to for a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the said order. The statement is accepted. 3This Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of the counsel for the Revenue. (R.M.SAVANT,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan