Case LawHigh Court › Wp(Md)/18465/2021 Of Dinamalar v. The As...

Wp(Md)/18465/2021 Of Dinamalar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Wp(Md)/18465/2021 Of Dinamalar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19, 2018-2019
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(Md)/18465/2021 Of Dinamalar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 6.The Writ Petition stands allowed, accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.04.2024 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021andW.M.P.(MD) Nos.15237 to 15239 of 2021 Dinamalar,represented by its Partner,5D, Trivandrum Road,Vannarpettai,Tirunelveli 627 003 ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -1, Income Tax Department, Nellai City Centre, Tiruchendur Road, Rahamath Nagar, Tirunelveli 627 001. 3.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1, Income Tax Department, No.2 CR Building, VP Rathina Swamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam Madurai 625 002. ... Respondents 1/6 W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the Writ Petitioner Partnership Firm on the file of the 1[st] Respondent to quash the impugned order dated 13.09.2021 passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act for the Assessment year 2018-19 in ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1035526674(1) and consequently direct the 1[st] respondent to complete the fresh assessment for the assessment year 2018-19 after granting reasonable/sufficient opportunity of hearing. For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Certiorarified Mandamus to to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 13.09.2021 for the assessment year 2018-19 in ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1035526674(1) and to direct the first respondent to complete the fresh assessment for the assessment year 2018-19 after granting reasonable/sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 2/6 W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 2.The petitioner was issued with a show cause notice dated 12.08.2021, wherein there was a proposal for adding the following amounts to the taxable income of the petitioner. TOTAL INCOME 3.The petitioner was to respond to the aforesaid show cause notice on or before 16.08.2021 by 23.59 hours. The petitioner was thereafter served with another notice dated 13.08.2021. They called upon the petitioner to respond by 23.08.2021 by 23.59 hours. Since the petitioner was not ready with the reply, the petitioner requested for adjournment on 17.08.2021 in response to the earlier show cause notice dated 12.08.2021. In the adjournment letter, the petitioner has stated as follows:- W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 “Not able to seek adjournment since the tab says that adjournment is available only 7 days prior to 31[st] March 2021. request to grant us time till the month end to submit the objections to the proposed assessment. vide notice no ITBA/AST/ F/147(SCN)/2021-22/1034827112” 4.Without giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply by granting adjournment, the second respondent has now passed the assessment order by adding a further sum of Rs.21,87,24,369/- towards addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thus, the impugned order has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, it is liable to be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5.Accordingly, theimpugnedorderpassedin ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1035526674(1) dated 13.09.2021 for the assessment year 2018-2019 by the first respondent is quashed and the case is remitted back to the first respondent to pass fresh orders within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that the impugned order and the show cause notice shall be read compendiously and a reply to the same shall also 4/6 W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 be filed by the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents are directed to enable the portal for receiving the reply from the petitioner. 6.The Writ Petition stands allowed, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 5.Accordingly, theimpugnedorderpassedin ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1035526674(1) dated 13.09.2021 for the assessment year 2018-2019 by the first respondent is quashed and the case is remitted back to the first respondent to pass fresh orders within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that the impugned order and the show cause notice shall be read compendiously and a reply to the same shall also 4/6 W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 be filed by the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents are directed to enable the portal for receiving the reply from the petitioner. 6.The Writ Petition stands allowed, accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / Nomm 08.04.2024 5/6 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 C.SARAVANAN, J. mm W.P.(MD) No.18465 of 2021 08.04.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan