Wp(Md)/512/2025 Of M/S. New Munira Traders v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
10 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Wp(Md)/512/2025 Of M/S. New Munira Traders v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(Md)/512/2025 Of M/S. New Munira Traders v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: With such liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.(MD) No.512 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD) No.512 of 2025andW.M.P.(MD) Nos.367 and 368 of 2025
M/S.New Munira Traders,represented by its PartnerMr.Mohammed Ismail
... Petitioner
/vs./
1.The Income Tax Officer,
Ward I, Kumbakonam,
First Floor, No.31, Krishnaswamy Road,
Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu 612 001.
2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Madurai -1,
Income Tax Annexe Building VP
Rathinasamy Nadar Road,
CR Building, Bibikulam,
Madurai, Tamil Nadu 625 002.
3.The Branch Manager,
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Kumbakonam Branch, No.129, TSR Big Street,
1/4
W.P.(MD) No.512 of 2025
Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District,
Tamil Nadu 612 001.
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned orderdated27-11-2024withthereference ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1-7-686046(1) issued by the First Respondent, quash the same in so far as it mandates the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.37,67,417/- as a condition for the stay of recovery of Rs.3,39,06,753/-.
For Petitioner: Mr.N.Murali
For R1 & R2
: Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
ORDER
The challenge in the writ petition is to an order granting an order of
conditional stay.
2. A reading of the impugned order would show that 7 equated monthly
installments have already been provided to the petitioner. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the conditions imposed, as I am of the view that liberal view had been taken by the first respondent. However, considering the fact that an appeal is pending and the petitioner claims that it is a partnership firm, which is
2/4
W.P.(MD) No.512 of 2025
not in operation as of today, there shall be a direction to the appellate authority concerned to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible.
3. With such liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Index : Yes / No10.01.2025Internet : Yes / Nomm
3/4
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.512 of 2025
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
mm
W.P.(MD) No.512 of 2025
10.01.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.