Case LawHigh Court › Wpms/1540/2023 Of Tushar Agarwal v. Comm...

Wpms/1540/2023 Of Tushar Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Wpms/1540/2023 Of Tushar Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wpms/1540/2023 Of Tushar Agarwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHANDAT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 28[th] JUNE, 2023 WRIT PETITION (M/S) No. 1540 of 2023 Between: Tushar Agarwal …Petitioner and Commissioner of Income Tax ..…Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. Present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:- “(A) A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 04.05.2023 (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition) issued by respondent qua the petitioner. (B) Any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (C) To award cost throughout to the petitioner.” 2. 2.Heard Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate, has requested to decide the present writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner - Tushar Agarwal to file his reply to the impugned notice dated 04.05.2023 within a week from today. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed the said submission. He has sought one week time to decide the reply of the petitioner. 5. With the consent of both the parties, the present Writ Petition (M/S) No.1540 of 2023 is disposed of with a direction to the respondent, in case, the petitioner files his reply within a week from today, to decide the said reply within a week from the date of receipt of the said reply, in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dated: 28.06.2023 Pant/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan