In Wpms/1631/2010 Of Radha Krishna Sharma v. The Government Of India, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate is<br>present for the respondents.<br>The Writ Petition is dismissed for want of<br>prosecution.<br>Interim order, if any, stands vacated.<br> **(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)**<br>Dated 15.03.2021<br>Shiv|
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||WPMS No. 1631 of 2010<br>**Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.**<br>List revised. None appears to press the Writ<br>Petition. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate is<br>present for the respondents.<br>The Writ Petition is dismissed for want of<br>prosecution.<br>Interim order, if any, stands vacated.<br> **(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)**<br>Dated 15.03.2021<br>Shiv|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue