Case Law › High Court › Wpms/2059/2024 Of Dns Treetop Hospitalit...

Wpms/2059/2024 Of Dns Treetop Hospitality Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Department

High Court 25 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

25 Jun 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpms/2059/2024 Of Dns Treetop Hospitality Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications stand disposed of, accordingly. **(Ravindra Mai...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

|**SL.** **No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,** **reports, orders or** **proceedings or** **directions and** **Registrar’s order** **with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|| |---|---|---|---|---|---| |D1- 57||||WPMS No.2059 of 2024 **Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.** Mr. Nitin Kanwar (through video conferencing) and Mr. Ishwar Singh Bisht, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications stand disposed of, accordingly. **(Ravindra Maithani J.)** 25.06.2025 RV||

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.