Case Law › High Court › Wpms/2234/2010 Of Hilliburton Offshore S...

Wpms/2234/2010 Of Hilliburton Offshore Services Inc v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax And Others

High Court 03 Apr 2015 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

03 Apr 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wpms/2234/2010 Of Hilliburton Offshore Services Inc v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

WPMS No. 2234 of 2010withWPMS No. 2235 of 2010withWPMS No. 219 of 2011AndWPMS No.220 of 2011Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. P.R. Mullick, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for respondents. Mr. P.R. Mullick, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that all these writ petitions are covered by the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 28.05.2013, rendered in Special Appeal No. 317 of 2012, therefore, all the petitions may be disposed of in same terms. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the respondents could not explain as to why these cases are not covered by the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 28.05.2013 (supra), therefore, all these writ petitions stand disposed of in terms of judge judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 28.05.2013, rendered in Special Appeal No. 317 of 2012. Let copy of this order be placed on each connected petitions. (Alok Singh, J.) 03.04.2015

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.