Wpms/2419/2016 Of Smt. Pushpa Majila v. Income Tax Officer, Bageshwar
High Court
06 Jun 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Wpms/2419/2016 Of Smt. Pushpa Majila v. Income Tax Officer, Bageshwar
Date of order
06 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wpms/2419/2016 Of Smt. Pushpa Majila v. Income Tax Officer, Bageshwar, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders**<br>**or proceedings**<br>**or directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||**W PMS 2 4 1 9 / 2 0 1 6**<br>**Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.**<br>Mr.<br>Bhupendra<br>Prasad,<br>Advocate, for the petitioner.<br>Mr.<br>Hari<br>Mohan<br>Bhatia,<br>Advocate, for the Revenue.<br>(2)<br>This writ petition was filed in<br>2016 seeking the following reliefs:<br>_“(i) Issue a writ, order or_<br>_direction in the nature of mandamus_<br>_commanding_<br>_and_<br>_directing_<br>_the_<br>_respondent no. 2 to furnish a proper_<br>_detail of Tax Deducted form the income_<br>_of the petitioner of the Assessment Year_<br>_2011-12 to the Income Tax Department._<br>_(ii)_<br>_Issue_<br>_a_<br>_writ,_<br>_order_<br>_or_<br>_direction in the nature of mandamus_<br>_commanding_<br>_and_<br>_directing_<br>_the_<br>_respondent no. 1 to refund the amount_<br>_of Rs. 1520/ - to the petitioner for_<br>_Assessment Year 2011-12 and also to_<br>_rectify mistake in the official website_<br>_showing the outstanding demand against_<br>_the petitioner.”_<br>(3)<br>Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned<br>Counsel appearing for the Revenue, on<br>instructions,<br>submits<br>that<br>petitioner’s<br>application under Section 154 of the<br>Income Tax Act has been decided by the<br>Assessing Officer on 25.4.2024 and a<br>sum of ₹2640/- (including interest) has<br>been refunded to petitioner. He thus|
|submits that writ petition has become|submits that writ petition has become|
|---|---|
|infructuous and it may be dismissed|as|
|such.||
|(4)<br>Mr. Bhupendra Prasad, learned||
|Counsel for the petitioner, does|not|
|dispute the aforesaid subm ission made||
|on behalf of Revenue.||
|(5)<br>Accordingly,<br>writ<br>petition|is|
|dism issed as infructuous.<br>**( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)**<br>**6 .6 .2 0 2 4**<br>Pr||
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.