Case Law › High Court › Wpms/2897/2015 Of State Bank Of India v....

Wpms/2897/2015 Of State Bank Of India v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds And Others

High Court 27 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

27 Jun 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wpms/2897/2015 Of State Bank Of India v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds And Others, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

WPMS No.2897 of 2015Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax/respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Udyog Shukla, Advocate for respondent no. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 4 would submit that the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Dehradun was served on the Department on 20[th] of this month only, and the Department will certainly give effect of the order, and if it is found that there is no outstanding demand as on date, the refund shall be made, in accordance with law, at the earliest. Recording the statement given by Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel received by him under instructions, the writ petition is closed. There will be no order as to costs. Let a certified copy of this judgment be issued today itself. Arpan

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.