Case Law › High Court › Wpms/343/2017 Of Shri Naunihal Singh v....

Wpms/343/2017 Of Shri Naunihal Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Aayakar Bhawan

High Court 14 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

14 Mar 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpms/343/2017 Of Shri Naunihal Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Aayakar Bhawan, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent. On last occasion also, petitioner was not represented. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. **( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)** 14.03.2023 ...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

|**SL.** **No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,** **reports, orders or** **proceedings or** **directions and** **Registrar’s order** **with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||WPMS No.343 of 2017 **Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.** There is no representation for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent. On last occasion also, petitioner was not represented. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. **( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)** 14.03.2023 _Arpan_|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.