Case LawHigh Court › Wpms/425/2009 Of Uttarakhand Peyjal Sans...

Wpms/425/2009 Of Uttarakhand Peyjal Sansadhan Vikas v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others

High Court 12 Jan 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Wpms/425/2009 Of Uttarakhand Peyjal Sansadhan Vikas v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
Date of order
12 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wpms/425/2009 Of Uttarakhand Peyjal Sansadhan Vikas v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
WPMS No. 425 of 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Ms. Joyce Irwin, Advocate holding brief of Mr. D. S. Patni, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents, even in the revised list. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite best efforts made by Mr. D.S. Patni, he could not be able to establish contact with the petitioner to obtain necessary information and up-to-date instructions, therefore, he has no instructions, as on day. Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the petitioner shall be liberty to get this petition revived, if he is able to get instructions from petitioner within four weeks from today. (Alok Singh, J.) 12.01.2015 SKS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan