Wpms/895/2013 Of M/S Schlumberger Asia Service Limited v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax
High Court
03 May 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Wpms/895/2013 Of M/S Schlumberger Asia Service Limited v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 May 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wpms/895/2013 Of M/S Schlumberger Asia Service Limited v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence the writ petition is dismissed as not being pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
WPMS No. 895 of 2013 Hon’ble Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.
Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate, present
for the petitioner.
Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate, present for the respondents.
Learned lawyer for the petitioner appears in the matter and submits that he received instruction from his client not to proceed with the matter.
Hence the writ petition is dismissed
as not being pressed.
The petitioner shall pay costs of this application assessed at `1000/- to the respondent within fortnight from date.
This order of cost is passed because the petitioner unnecessarily wasted the Court’s valuable time for the last four days. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner argued the matter taking Court’s valuable time for four days and the respondents contested also. As a matter of fact, the Court had to summon the Officer of the Department, who came yesterday. Therefore, this wastage of time must be compensated.
(K.J. Sengupta, J.) 03.05.2013
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue