Case LawHigh Court › Wpo/804/2024 Usha Martin Telematics Limi...

Wpo/804/2024 Usha Martin Telematics Limited v. Deputy Commisioner Of Income Tax Circle 5/1 And Ors

High Court 23 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Wpo/804/2024 Usha Martin Telematics Limited v. Deputy Commisioner Of Income Tax Circle 5/1 And Ors
Date of order
23 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wpo/804/2024 Usha Martin Telematics Limited v. Deputy Commisioner Of Income Tax Circle 5/1 And Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

od 3 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE. WPO/804/2024 USHA MARTIN TELEMATICS LIMITED VS DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5/1 AND ORS. BEFORE THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: September 23, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Mrunal Parekh, Adv.(VC) Mr. Sourjyo Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Vishwarup Acharyyo, Adv. Mr. Akash Dutta, Adv. …for petitioner Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv. Mr. Ayush Sharma, Adv. …for respondent The Court: 1. The petitioner, inter alia, is aggrieved by the failure on the part of the respondent to dispose of its rectification application dated 5[th] February, 2010 for the assessment year 2006-07. 2. Mr. Rai, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent on the other hand by placing before this Court, the rectification order passed under Section 154, 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the said Act) dated 27[th] August, 2024 would submit that the petitioner’s rectification application dated 5[th] February, 2010 has already been disposed of, by the aforesaid order. 3. Let a copy of the aforesaid order be taken on record. 4. Having regard to the above, since the petitioner’s grievance as regards non disposal of this rectification application has already been met, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending. 5. It shall be open to the petitioner to take appropriate recourse to the aforesaid order, if so advised. . aforesaid order, if so advised. . 6. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. disposed of. GH. (RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan