Case Law › High Court › Wpss v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of...

Wpss v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

12 Nov 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpss v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

|**SL.** **No**|**Date**|**Office Notes, reports,** **orders or proceedings or** **directions and Registrar’s** **order with Signatures**|**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---| ||**12.11.2021**||WPSS No. 1432 of 2021 **Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.** Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate, for the respondent(s). Looking to the nature of reliefs sought by the petitioner in the present writ petition wherein the petitioner has put a challenge to the order dated 09.04.2019 at a belated stage which was rendered by the respondents in compliance of the orders passed by the Court, this Court is of the view that appropriate recourse available to the petitioner would be to approach Central Administrative Tribunal where the Income Tax Department has been notified. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty left open to the petitioner to approach Central Administrative Tribunal in accordance with law. **(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)** 12.11.2021 Mahinder/|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.