Case Law › High Court › Wpt v. Principal Director Of Income Tax,...

Wpt v. Principal Director Of Income Tax, Investigation, Raipur, C.g

High Court 14 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

14 Feb 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wpt v. Principal Director Of Income Tax, Investigation, Raipur, C.g, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 21 of 2024 M/s Paras Jewelers, Proprietor Inder Chand Jain, Through ItsSpecial Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Paras Chand Jain, S/o Inder Chand Jain, Aged About 50 Years, Having Its Registered Office At 1, Sbi Road, Balaji Ward, Jagdalpur, Bastar, C.G. Special Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Paras Chand Jain, S/o Inder Chand Jain, Aged About 50 Years, Having Its Registered Office At 1, Sbi Road, Balaji Ward, Jagdalpur, Bastar, C.G. ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Director Of Income Tax, Investigation, Raipur, C.G. 2. Additional Director Income Tax (Investigation Unit-3) Raipur, C.G. C.G. 3. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigation Unit 3) Raipur, C.G. C.G. ---- Respondents For Petitioner: Mr. Sidharth Dubey on behalf of Mr. Apurv Goyal, Advocates Advocates For respondents: Mr. Ajay Kumrani on behalf of Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocates. Advocates. Hon'ble Shri Justice Order on Board Narendra Kumar Vyas 14.02.2024 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the ADIT/DDIT (Inv-3) before appropriate forum. with liberty to challenge the order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the ADIT/DDIT (Inv-3) before appropriate forum. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd- (Narendra Kumar Vyas)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.