Case LawHigh Court › Wpt v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income...

Wpt v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Bungalowno

High Court 11 Dec 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Wpt v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Bungalowno
Date of order
11 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpt v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Bungalowno, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR NAFR WPT No. 272 of 2023 Mutyala Mohan S/o Shri M. K. Swamy Aged About 63 Years R/oQuarter No. B, Block No. 2, Street No. 10, Sector-5, Bhilai, PsBhilai, Thehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 490001 Pan- Mutyala Mohan S/o Shri M. K. Swamy Aged About 63 Years R/oQuarter No. B, Block No. 2, Street No. 10, Sector-5, Bhilai, PsBhilai, Thehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 490001 Pan- ---- Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), BungalowNo. 32, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) 491006 Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), BungalowNo. 32, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) 491006 ---- Respondent For Petitioner For Respondent : Mr. S. Rajeshwara Rao, Advocate : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 11.12.2023 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Courtto withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail the remedyavailable under the Chhattisgarh Settlement of Arrears of Tax,Interest and Penalty Act, 2023 for settlement. He would furthersubmit that without proof of withdrawal, the settlement prayercannot be entertained.to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail the remedyavailable under the Chhattisgarh Settlement of Arrears of Tax,Interest and Penalty Act, 2023 for settlement. He would furthersubmit that without proof of withdrawal, the settlement prayercannot be entertained. 2.Considering the aforesaid submission, the petitioner is permittedto withdraw the instant petition. to withdraw the instant petition. 3.Accordingly, the instant petitions is dismissed as withdrawnreserving the aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. reserving the aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. 4.Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the order to thepetitioner after obtaining photocopy of the same.petitioner after obtaining photocopy of the same. Sd/-(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan