Case Law › High Court › Wpt v. Commissioner Income Tax Income Ta...

Wpt v. Commissioner Income Tax Income Tax Office, Ayakar Bhawan Raipurchhattisgarh.chhattisgarh

High Court 05 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

05 Feb 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wpt v. Commissioner Income Tax Income Tax Office, Ayakar Bhawan Raipurchhattisgarh.chhattisgarh, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 5 of 2019 M/s T. C. Buildcon Pvt Ltd. Pvt. Ltd. A Private Limited Company DulyIncorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Address AtVasudev B -5 ,sector 5, Devendra Nagar Raipur Through Its Director AmitTiwari S/o Shri Rajendra Tiwari Aged About 38 Year R/o Shankar NagarRaipur Chhattisgarh.Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Address AtVasudev B -5 ,sector 5, Devendra Nagar Raipur Through Its Director AmitTiwari S/o Shri Rajendra Tiwari Aged About 38 Year R/o Shankar NagarRaipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Commissioner Income Tax Income Tax Office, Ayakar Bhawan RaipurChhattisgarh.Chhattisgarh. 2. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner: Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate. For Respondents: Smt. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 05/02/2019: 1. The order under challenge being appealable, let the petitioner prefer anAppeal before the CIT (Appeals) within a period of 15 days from today. Onsuch Appeal being filed, the said authority shall consider and decide thesame within next 8 weeks.Appeal before the CIT (Appeals) within a period of 15 days from today. Onsuch Appeal being filed, the said authority shall consider and decide thesame within next 8 weeks. 2. If the respondents take any coercive steps against the petitioner, he wouldbe at liberty to move afresh before this Court.be at liberty to move afresh before this Court. 3. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.