Wp(T) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
High Court
31 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Wp(T) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
Date of order
31 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(T) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WP(T) No. 67 of 2021
Ambition Buildcon Private Limited, Address- House No. 11, Jalvihar Colony, Raipur,Chhattisgarh Through Managing Director- Anil Nacharani, Aged About 51 Years, S/o.Late Shri N.P. Nachrani, R/o. House No. 11, Jal Vihar Colony, Near Marine Drive,Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Raipur, District Raipur,Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
WP(T) No. 68 of 2021
Ambition Buildcon Private Limited, Address House No. 11, Jalvihar Colony, RaipurChhattisgarh, Through Managing Director- Anil Nacharani, Aged About 51 Years, S/o.Late Shri N. P. Nachrani, R/o. House No. 11, Jalvihar Colony, Raipur Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Raipur, District RaipurChhattisgarh
---- Respondent
WP(T) No. 69 of 2021
Ambition Buildcon Private Limited, Address House No. 11, Jalvihar Colony, Raipur,Chhattisgarh, Through Managing Director- Anil Nacharani, Aged About 51 Years, S/o.Late Shri N.P. Nachrani, R/o. House No. 11, Jal Vihar Colony, Near Marine DistrictRaipur Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Raipur, District Raipur,Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
31.08.2021Mr. Sunny Agrawal, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Amit Choudhari with Mrs. Naushina Ali, Advocates for theRespondents. Heard
Ashok
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that during pendency ofthese petitions, the final assessment orders have been passed;therefore, these petitions have become infructuous. He submits that thepetitioners may be given liberty to challenge the final assessmentorders.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the petitions are dismissed ashaving become infructuous. However, the petitioners are at liberty tochallenge the final assessment orders.
Sd/-Li(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.