Case LawHigh Court › Wpt v. For

Wpt v. For

High Court 25 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Wpt v. For
Date of order
25 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wpt v. For, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 88 of 2022 M/s Satya Vidya Real Estate Private Limited A Company Duly RegisteredUnder The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956, Having Its RegisteredOffice At, Hatari Bazar Road Sakti- 495689, Chhattisgarh Through Its DirectorArun Kumar Agrawal ---- Petitioner Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956, Having Its RegisteredOffice At, Hatari Bazar Road Sakti- 495689, Chhattisgarh Through Its DirectorArun Kumar Agrawal ---- Petitioner Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle, Bilaspur, Income TaxDepartment, Having Its Office At , Aayakar Bhawan, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur,District- Bilaspur-495001, Chhattisgarh ---- RespondentsDepartment, Having Its Office At , Aayakar Bhawan, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur,District- Bilaspur-495001, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocate For Respondent :Shri Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf ofShri Amit Chaudhary, AdvocateShri Amit Chaudhary, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuOrder on Board 25.03.2022 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after conclusion of proceedingsinitiated under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, no adverse order has beenpassed against petitioner. Hence, now the petition rendered infructuous and he is notpressing the petition. 2.In view of above submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, Writ Petitionis dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan