Wpt v. Chief Commissioner Income Tax, Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipurchhattisgarh.chhattisgarh
High Court
12 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Wpt v. Chief Commissioner Income Tax, Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipurchhattisgarh.chhattisgarh
Date of order
12 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wpt v. Chief Commissioner Income Tax, Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipurchhattisgarh.chhattisgarh, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPT No.16 of 2019
Smt. Savitri Devi Mittal, Aged About 46 Years, W/o Shri MahendraMittal Near Canal Shiv Mandir Near Chandanipara, Post OfficeChampa District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh.Mittal Near Canal Shiv Mandir Near Chandanipara, Post OfficeChampa District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Chief Commissioner Income Tax, Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines, RaipurChhattisgarh.Chhattisgarh.
2. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Appeals ) Aaykar Bhawan VyaparVihar, Bharti Nagar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.Vihar, Bharti Nagar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
3. Tax Recovery Officer, Bilaspur Mahima Complex, Vyapar ViharBilaspur Chhattisgarh.Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
:Shri Gary Mukhopadhayay, Advocate.
For Respondent
:Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate.
Order On Board
By
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra.
12/03/2019
1. Admittedly, petitioner's appeal against the order of assessment ispending before the CIT (Appeals) since 13.04.2015 and there is nointerim order staying the recovery of Income Tax dues against thepetitioner.pending before the CIT (Appeals) since 13.04.2015 and there is nointerim order staying the recovery of Income Tax dues against thepetitioner.
2. The present Writ Petition is against the order of attachment.
3. Considering the fact that petitioner's appeal is pending before the CIT(Appeals) for last about 4 years ends of justice would be served if theCIT (Appeals) is directed to decide the matter at the earliest preferablywithin a period of six weeks from today.(Appeals) for last about 4 years ends of justice would be served if theCIT (Appeals) is directed to decide the matter at the earliest preferablywithin a period of six weeks from today.
4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on themerits of the case.merits of the case.
5. In the meanwhile, the order of attachment may continue and if theIncome Tax Authority proceeds to put the attached property to auction,the petitioner would at liberty to move an application for stay before theAppellate Authority.Income Tax Authority proceeds to put the attached property to auction,the petitioner would at liberty to move an application for stay before theAppellate Authority.
Sd/-
(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge
Ayushi
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.