Case Law › High Court › Wpt v. Income Tax Officer Tds And Ors

Wpt v. Income Tax Officer Tds And Ors

High Court 28 Jul 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

28 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpt v. Income Tax Officer Tds And Ors, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.T‘ne writ petition is accordingiy dismissed as withdrawn.No order as it) COSTS.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

I HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURWrit Petition (T) No. 1802 @2008 'DistilieriesWciwmePvt.Ltd.AcompanyimorporaiedundertheCompaniesAct,1956‘ilam'ngits()fiECe at Super Market, Near AgrasenChewk,Biiaspurtin‘uughitsDirectorSubhash‘S/oJ’aiswaLAged‘aheut42yearsLateGP.iaiswai resident of High Ceurt Road, Chhattisgarh.2,SubhashJaiswai,Director, WeicomeDistil‘leriesPvt, Ltd, aged about 42 years 8/0 Late Shri GP.Jaiswa} resident of High Cnurt Road, Chhattisgarh. PE?1TIONERS VERS US 1.IncmneTax()fiicer(TDS),MahimaCommerciaiCompiex, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur (CG).Compiex, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur (CG). RESPGNV§)EN’§S 2.JOim:CommissionerofincomeTaxMahimaCommerciai Complex, Vyapar Vihar. Bilaspur (CG).Commerciai Complex, Vyapar Vihar. Bilaspur (CG). (WET [ UNDER][ ARTICLE][ 2Z6][ OF][ THE][ CON][ STK'I‘UTION][ OF][ INDIA)] {33:fiowbie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J.) Present:Shri Prashant Ja1swaé, Senior Advocate with Shri Ali Asgar,Atlvocate for the petiiioners.Atlvocate for the petiiioners. Siiri Sourabh Dangi. Acivocate for the responcients. (Jaw. 01mm {gamma[m1][ this][ 2am][ day][ as][ Juiy,][ 2093)] i.ie‘.No.O6.Thisis anappiicationfor withdrawai of[’{he]WritPetition. on the grounds stated in the application. No objection fromother sitie.Petition. on the grounds stated in the application. No objection fromother sitie. h)It is ordered aecordingiy. 3.T‘ne writ petition is accordingiy dismissed as withdrawn.No order as it) COSTS. 4.Consequentiy, EA. No.1, appiication for interim order, also stands‘‘disnosed of. SatishSd/~k K.Ag'nihmii.Judgei

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.