Case LawHigh Court › Wria/643/2023 Of Raj Narayan Agrahari v....

Wria/643/2023 Of Raj Narayan Agrahari v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another

High Court 10 Feb 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wria/643/2023 Of Raj Narayan Agrahari v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another
Date of order
10 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wria/643/2023 Of Raj Narayan Agrahari v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: With the aforesaid, the petition stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 643 of 2023 Petitioner :- Raj Narayan AgrahariRespondent :- Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And AnotherCounsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. heard Shri Amitabh Agarwal, learned counsel forthe petitioner and Shri Gaurav Mahajan alongwithShri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for therespondents. By means of the instant petition, the petitionerprays for the following relief:- "(1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorariquashing the office memorandum dated 23.10.2020 bearingReferenceNo.F.No.Pr.CC/Lko/HC/WP/RNAgrahari/2021-22/4580 dated 30.08.2022 together with the Final GradationList of Income Tax Inspectors as on 01.01.2020 approved on23.10.2020 passed by the respondent no.1 communicated to thepetitioner on 05.09.2022 whereby the petitioner has wronglyand illegally been placed at Serial No.213 at Internal PageNo.9 of the aforesaid list." Learned counsel appearing for the respondentsShri Mahajan has raised preliminary objectionregarding maintainability of the petition on theground that the order under challenge is assailablebefore the Central Administrative Tribunal and inlight of the availability of the statutory remedy,the instant petition may not be entertained. Learned counsel for the petitioner after making hissubmissions at some length submits that he maybe permitted to withdraw the petition with libertyto 1le the petition before the CentralAdministrative Tribunal within a week. However,indulgence has been sought to the limited extentthat in case if the petition 1les the said applicationbefore the Central Administrative Tribunal, thesame may be expedited, to which counsel for therespondents has no objection. Considering the aforesaid, the petition is dismissedas withdrawn with liberty to approach the CentralAdministrative Tribunal and in case if the petitioner1les the petition before Central AdministrativeTribunal within a period of ten days from today,the Central Administrative Tribunal shallendeavour to decide expeditiously preferablywithin a period of eight month after a3ording fullopportunity of hearing to the parties but withoutgranting any unnecessary adjournments. With the aforesaid, the petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 10.2.2023ank
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan