Wta/82/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Asofen Ltd
High Court
14 Oct 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wta/82/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Asofen Ltd
Date of order
14 Oct 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wta/82/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Asofen Ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Issue: The questions framed is as under:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in holding that it is essential to invoke specific explanation to 18(1)(c) of W.T.Act, before passing of a penalty order u/s.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-= : 1 : =-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.81 OF 2002ANDWEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.82 OF 2002
WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.81 OF 2002
AND
WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.82 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Wealth-tax ..Applicant.
V/s.
Asofan Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Parag Vyas i/b. Dr.T.C. Kaushik for applicant in
all the appalications.
Mr.K.Gopal for respondent in all the applications.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2005.
DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard. Rule, returnable forthwith.
2. Mr.K.Gopal, the learned counsel for the
respondent waives service.
3. Heard finally by the consent of the parties.
Both the parties agree that the question sought to be
raised by the Revenue needs consideration at the hands
of this Court. Therefore, dispensing with the reasons
-= : 2 : =-
in support of this order, the Tribunal is directed to
refer the question framed for the opinion of this Court
with statement of case. The questions framed is as
under:-
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case, the Tribunal erred in holding that it is
essential to invoke specific explanation to 18(1)(c)
of W.T.Act, before passing of a penalty order u/s.
18(1)(c) of W.T.Act, particularly when the said
explanation is very much a part of the main
section?"’
. In this view of the matter, applications
stand disposed off in terms of this order. Rule is
made absolute with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.