Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/1042/2021 Of Alm Food Products Limi...

Wtax/1042/2021 Of Alm Food Products Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 2 Others

High Court 06 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/1042/2021 Of Alm Food Products Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 2 Others
Date of order
06 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wtax/1042/2021 Of Alm Food Products Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 2 Others, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: For reasons given therein, the presentwrit petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) the order dated 10.09.2021 insofar as it seeks to reject the petitioner'sobjection on assumption of jurisdiction to reassess the petitioner forA.Y.2016-17, is set aside; (ii) the petitioner sha...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Court No. - 21Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1042 of 2021Petitioner :- Alm Food Products LimitedRespondent :- Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Suyash AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Gaurav MahajanHon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, SriGaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the revenue and Sri Gopal Verma,learned counsel for the union of India. 2. Challenge has been raised to the re-assessment proceeding initiatedagainst the petitioner for the A.Y. 2016-17 vide reassessment noticeissued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafterreferred to as the 'Act') dated 30.03.2021 by the Deputy CommissionerIncome Tax Circle-3(1)(1), Muzaffarnagar. 3. By a detailed order passed today in WRIT TAX No. - 979 of 2021, wehave disposed of the writ petition. For reasons given therein, the presentwrit petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) the order dated 10.09.2021 insofar as it seeks to reject the petitioner'sobjection on assumption of jurisdiction to reassess the petitioner forA.Y.2016-17, is set aside; (ii) the petitioner shall have two weeks' time from now to file a detailedobjection to the reasons to believe contained in the order dated10.09.2021; (iii) upon such objection filed, the assessing authority may fix a shortdate for personal hearing on the objection, within next two weekstherefrom. Order Date :- 6.12.2021S.Chaurasia
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan