Wtax/1530/2022 Of Jameer Ahmed v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Another
High Court
22 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/1530/2022 Of Jameer Ahmed v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Another
Date of order
22 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wtax/1530/2022 Of Jameer Ahmed v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Another, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the said fact, as the petitioner has alternative remedyof filing appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, thewrit petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1530 of 2022
Petitioner :- Jameer Ahmed
Respondent :- Commissioner Of Income Tax AnotherCounsel for Petitioner :- Naveen Chandra Gupta,Arjit Gupta,Manish GuptaCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Manu Ghildiyal, learned counsel for the respondent hasraised a preliminary objection that against the impugned order,petitioner has right of appeal under Section 253 of Income TaxAct before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which fact is notdisputed by counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the said fact, as the petitioner has alternative remedyof filing appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, thewrit petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
However, in case the appeal is preferred by the petitioner within15 days from today, the Tribunal shall not go into the questionof limitation and shall decide the appeal on merits.
Order Date :- 22.12.2022Kushal
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.