Wtax/1680/2018 Of Varun Gupta v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation) And Another
High Court
09 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/1680/2018 Of Varun Gupta v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation) And Another
Date of order
09 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wtax/1680/2018 Of Varun Gupta v. The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation) And Another, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the alternative remedy availed by the petitioner, thewrit petition fails and is accordingly dismissed withoutprejudice to the rights of the petitioner petitioner in the pendingappeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1680 of 2018
Petitioner :- Varun GuptaRespondent :- The Director General Of Income Tax (Investigation) And AnotherCounsel for Petitioner :- Praval TripathiCounsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,Gaurav Mahajan,Manu Ghildyal
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard Sri Praval Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner andSri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for the revenue.
The present petition filed challenging the notices issued to thepetitioner under Section 153-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred as the Act) for the F.Ys. 2011-12, 2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 and further assessmentnotices issued consequent thereto.
While no order was granted in favour of the petitioner, ademand was raised under Section 156 of the Act by order dated27.12.2018. The petitioner has filed an amendment applicationchallenging that order. That application is still pending.
Undisputedly, the aforesaid assessment orders are appealable. The petitioner also challenged the same by way of appeal,details of which have been disclosed by the revenue in thecounter affidavit filed in the present petition.
In view of the alternative remedy availed by the petitioner, thewrit petition fails and is accordingly dismissed withoutprejudice to the rights of the petitioner petitioner in the pendingappeal.
Order Date :- 9.9.2021M. Tariq
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.