Case Law › High Court › Wtax/1758/2025 Of Sudhir Kumar v. The As...

Wtax/1758/2025 Of Sudhir Kumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Acit-1 Moradabad And Another

High Court 21 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisdb_16012018

Parties

Date of order

21 Apr 2025

Assessment year(s)

2017-18

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wtax/1758/2025 Of Sudhir Kumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Acit-1 Moradabad And Another, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1758 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Respondent :- The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Acit-1Moradabad And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Niraj Kumar SinghCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that petitions raisingsimilar issues are pending consideration before this Court led byWrit Tax No. 838 of 2024 wherein notices have been ordered to beissued and interim order has been granted by this Court. 2. In view of the submissions made, counter affidavit to thepetition, if any, be filed by the next date. 3. Connect with Writ Tax No. 838 of 2024. 4. In the meanwhile and till further orders, the demand noticedated 29.03.2025 (Annexure-11) pursuant to the assessment orderdated 29.03.2025 AY 2017-18 shall remain stayed. Order Date :- 22.4.2025Imroz (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.