Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/180/2018 Of M/S Presidency Infrahei...

Wtax/180/2018 Of M/S Presidency Infraheights Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2

High Court 21 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/180/2018 Of M/S Presidency Infraheights Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2
Date of order
21 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Wtax/180/2018 Of M/S Presidency Infraheights Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 180 of 2018 Petitioner :- M/S Presidency Infraheights Pvt. Ltd. Respondent :- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-2Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Ankur AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Supplementary Affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard Sri R.R. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Suyash Agrawal, learned Counsel forthe petitioner and Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learnedCounsel for the department. The petitioner has filed an application for review on 05.02.2018 with regard to the stay matter seekingrelief under the two circulars issued by the departmentas Instruction No.1914 dated 21.03.1996 which waspartially modified by Instructions No.404/72/93-ITCCdated 29.12.2016. A bare reading of the circular reflects that anopportunity of hearing is inbuilt when a matter is to bereviewed. From the facts and circumstances of the present case, it appears that the review application was filed on05.02.2018 and an order was passed on 08.02.2018without even giving to the petitioner an opportunity ofhearing . In view of this and keeping in mind the principles of natural justice the order dated 08.02.2018 is set aside.The department will give to the petitioner anopportunity of hearing on the application made bythem after fixing a date in the matter. Learned Counsel for the department is present here. Inthe presence of both counsels this Court fixes 12th ofMarch, 2018 as the date for hearing of the reviewapplication. No adjournment may be allowed to eitherside on that date unless there are some exceptionalcircumstances. Till 12th March, 2018 no coercive action may be takenagainst the petitioner. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as above. Nocosts. Order Date :- 21.2.2018S.P.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan