Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/18/2019 Of M/S L.h. Sugar Factories...

Wtax/18/2019 Of M/S L.h. Sugar Factories Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2 Bareilly And 2 Others

High Court 08 Jan 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/18/2019 Of M/S L.h. Sugar Factories Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2 Bareilly And 2 Others
Date of order
08 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wtax/18/2019 Of M/S L.h. Sugar Factories Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2 Bareilly And 2 Others, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Court No. - 35Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 18 of 2019Petitioner :- M/S L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. Respondent :- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2 Bareilly And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Sri. Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, Sr. AdvocateCounsel for Respondent :- Bharati Agrawal, Sr. Advocate,Ajay Narayan, Sr. Advocate Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard Shri R.R. Agrawal, learned senior counsel assisted byShri Suyash Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner andShri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the department. The petitioner has come up with several prayers. Basically, thegrievance of the petitioner is that a special audit is going to beconducted against him without even considering his reply andwithout giving him relevant materials, on the basis of whichthe order has been passed to conduct the special audit. Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the departmentassures the Court that the reply sent by the petitioner to thenotice dated 16.11.2018 on 23.11.2018 shall be considered inaccordance with law. He will be given all the materials anddocuments on the basis of which the proceedings are likely tobe conducted. To obviate any further orders being passed before hearing thepetitioner, we fix 21st of January 2019 as the date for hearingin the matter in the presence of both the parties before therespondent no.1. The petitioner may be heard in person on thatdate along with the material and documents. It is needless tosay that the proceedings will carry on in accordance with law. The direction to proceed dated 11.12.2018 is set aside by theCourt. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 8.1.2019/pks
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan