Wtax/189/2019 Of Rajesh Kumar Venkatesh v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Another
High Court
21 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/189/2019 Of Rajesh Kumar Venkatesh v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Another
Date of order
21 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wtax/189/2019 Of Rajesh Kumar Venkatesh v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Another, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 189 of 2019
Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Venkatesh
Respondent :- Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Bansal,Surendra Kumar Garg
Counsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for therespondents.
The writ petition encloses annexure-9 which shows that the
order has been passed on 09.01.2019 by which the appeal (S.P.13/Alld/18 and 5,6,7/Alld/18) of the petitioner has beentransferred to Lucknow. Originally, the appeal was at Varanasi.It is also admitted to the petitioner that 50 per cent of thedemand has already been satisfied by the assessee.
In view of this, no further demand may be made by the
assessee and the appeal of the assessee may be decided by theTribunal at Lucknow within a period of three months from thedate of presentation of a certified copy of this order before it.
For a period of three months, no coercive action may be taken
against the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.2.2019/pks
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.