Wtax/249/2020 Of Rakesh Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(1) And Another
High Court
05 Mar 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/249/2020 Of Rakesh Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(1) And Another
Date of order
05 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wtax/249/2020 Of Rakesh Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(1) And Another, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is liable to bedismissed on this ground alone and stands accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 249 of 2020
Petitioner :- Rakesh Sharma S/o Shri Ram Pal Sharma, R/o 261, Sector-1, Chiranjiv Vihar, Ghaziabad
Respondent :- Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(1) and another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Swapnil Kumar,Sudhanshu Kumar
Counsel for Respondents :- Krishna Agarwal
Hon'ble Biswanath Somadder,J.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and upon perusing thepapers before us, we are a bit surprised to take note of the fact even whileapproaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, thepetitioner has taken out an application before the statutory appellateauthority essentially seeking similar relief, i.e. stay of demand. Thisamounts to an abuse of process of Court. The writ petition is liable to bedismissed on this ground alone and stands accordingly dismissed.
Dismissal of this petition, however, shall not cause any prejudice to therights of the writ petitioner in respect of the merits of his applicationpending before the statutory appellate authority.
Order Date :- 5.3.2020
Imroz
(Biswanath Somadder,J.)
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.