Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/3137/2025 Of Mku Limited v. Assista...

Wtax/3137/2025 Of Mku Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 11 Kanpur And 2 Others

High Court 14 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/3137/2025 Of Mku Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 11 Kanpur And 2 Others
Date of order
14 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wtax/3137/2025 Of Mku Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 11 Kanpur And 2 Others, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 3137 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mku Limited Respondent :- Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2 11 Kanpur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anant Kumar Tiwari,Gaurav Mahajan Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, SriAnant Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondentno. 3/Union of India and Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counselappearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 and 2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing theimpugned order passed by Respondent No. 1 dated 07.04.2025 rejecting therectification application of the petitioner filed u/s 154 of the Act for A.Y.2018-19 (Annexure No. 1). (ii) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directingrespondent No.1 to dispose of the application u/s 154 of the act afteraffording opportunity of personal hearing." Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we find that theorder passed by respondent no. 1/Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax Circle 2(1)(1), Kanpur, under section 154 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, was passed without granting opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner. In our view, this is a violation of principles of audi alteram partemand, accordingly, is in violation of principles of natural justice. In light of the same, the order dated April 07, 2025 passed byrespondent no. 1/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle2(1)(1), Kanpur, is quashed and set aside with a direction upon theauthorities to grant opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, inaccordance with law. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 K.K. Maurya (Praveen Kumar Giri, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan