Wtax/322/2023 Of M/S Manoj Kumar Indira Rani Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/322/2023 Of M/S Manoj Kumar Indira Rani Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wtax/322/2023 Of M/S Manoj Kumar Indira Rani Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with theobservation, in case the petitioner files any statutory appealagainst the impugned order dated 20.12.2022 for A.Y.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 322 of 2023
Petitioner :- M/S Manoj Kumar Indira Rani GuptaRespondent :- Assistant Commissioner Of Income TaxCounsel for Petitioner :- Kartikeya Saran,Srishti GuptaCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief JusticeHon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Sri Kartikeya Saran alongwith Ms. Srishti Gupta, learnedcounsel for the assessee and Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learnedcounsel for the revenue.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits, theimpugned order dated 20.12.2022 is appealable. However,limitation has just expired.
3. In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with theobservation, in case the petitioner files any statutory appealagainst the impugned order dated 20.12.2022 for A.Y. 2014-15,within two weeks from today, that appeal may be entertainedand dealt with on its own merits without raising any objectionto the limitation.
Order Date :- 27.3.2023Abhilash
.
(S. D. Singh, J) (Pritinker Diwaker, CJ)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue