Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/375/2024 Of Manoj Kumar Sharma v. P...

Wtax/375/2024 Of Manoj Kumar Sharma v. Prin. Director Of Income Tax Investigation Lko. And 3 Others

High Court 16 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cishclko
Parties
Wtax/375/2024 Of Manoj Kumar Sharma v. Prin. Director Of Income Tax Investigation Lko. And 3 Others
Date of order
16 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wtax/375/2024 Of Manoj Kumar Sharma v. Prin. Director Of Income Tax Investigation Lko. And 3 Others, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Issue: If it does not do so, then opposite party no.2may see as to whether it has jurisdiction to intervene andresolve the matter as per law and if, it has jurisdiction, then itshall do the needful as per law but with expedition.

Decision: Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. .

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 375 of 2024 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Sharma Respondent :- Prin. Director Of Income Tax Investigation Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arunendra Nath Mishra,Prashant SrivastavaCounsel for Respondent :- Kushagra Dikshit Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Let the petitioner implead the District Rural DevelopmentAgency, Hardoi through its Project Director as an oppositeparty in this petition. 3. Considering the order proposed to be passed, issuance ofnotice to the newly impleaded opposite party is dispensed with. 4. Being aggrieved by the incorrect deduction of TDS by theProject Director, District Rural Development Agency, Hardoi an application has been submitted to opposite party no.2,whereupon opposite party no.2, as informed by the counsel forthe Revenue, has written to the deductor, but till date the issuehas not been resolved. 5. Let the newly impleaded opposite party look into the matterand do the needful. If it does not do so, then opposite party no.2may see as to whether it has jurisdiction to intervene andresolve the matter as per law and if, it has jurisdiction, then itshall do the needful as per law but with expedition. 6. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 16.1.2025/Rao/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan