Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/459/2018 Of Deepak Chopra v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others
Date of order
21 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Wtax/459/2018 Of Deepak Chopra v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, weallow the petitioner thirty days to file an appeal from today.In case the petitioner files an appeal, it is needless to saythat it would be disposed of in accordance with law andno coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner fora period...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 459 of 2018Petitioner :- Deepak ChopraRespondent :- Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Suyash AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard R.R. Agarwal learned senior advocate assisted bySri Suyash Agarwal learned counsel for the petitioner andSri Krishna Agarwal learned counsel for the department.
Sri Krishna Agarwal has handed over a photocopy of theassessment order as well as demand notice to thepetitioner today in court.
It was the petitioner's case that the assessment order andthe demand notice were never served at the correctaddress of the petitioner and instead garnishee noticewas sent to him seeking to attach his bank account. Nowthat the petitioner has an unofficially copy of assessmentorder. It is open to the petitioner to file an appeal againstthe said assessment order.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, weallow the petitioner thirty days to file an appeal from today.In case the petitioner files an appeal, it is needless to saythat it would be disposed of in accordance with law andno coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner fora period of thirty days.
With the above observation, the writ petition shall standdisposed of finally. No costs.
Order Date :- 21.3.2018rk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.