Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/5/2025 Of Amit Kumar Ghidia And 2 O...

Wtax/5/2025 Of Amit Kumar Ghidia And 2 Others v. Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance Deptt. Of Income Tax New Delhi And 3 Others

High Court 20 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cishclko
Parties
Wtax/5/2025 Of Amit Kumar Ghidia And 2 Others v. Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance Deptt. Of Income Tax New Delhi And 3 Others
Date of order
20 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wtax/5/2025 Of Amit Kumar Ghidia And 2 Others v. Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance Deptt. Of Income Tax New Delhi And 3 Others, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 5 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Ghidia And 2 OthersRespondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of FinanceDeptt. Of Income Tax New Delhi And 3 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Mudit AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dr. Ravi Kumar Mishra,Kushagra Dikshit Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioner seeks release of jewellery, ornaments and otherarticles of gold and silver seized from the lockers no. 71 & 913,HDFC Bank, Hazratganj, Lucknow on 09.04.2024, as theybelong to the family members and have been duly declared inthe Wealth Tax Returns. Learned Counsel has referred toSection 132 (B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in this regard. Learned Counsel for the Revenue says that no application hasbeen submitted before the Assessing Officer, as per thedocuments annexed with the writ petition, a fact which couldnot be refuted as of now by the Counsel for the petitioners. Nevertheless, as there is a provision contained in Section 132(B), let the petitioners submit an application subject to thestatutory period prescribed, before the Assessing Officer interms of the said provision, which shall be considered anddecided as per law, but with expedition. If the application hadalready been submitted but the same is not on record, the samewould be considered and processed as per law. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 20.1.2025Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan