Wtax/557/2022 Of Alm Food Products Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 3 Others
High Court
11 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/557/2022 Of Alm Food Products Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 3 Others
Date of order
11 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wtax/557/2022 Of Alm Food Products Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 3 Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 557 of 2022
Petitioner :- Alm Food Products LimitedRespondent :- Deputy Commissioner Income Tax Officer And 3 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Suyash AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Sri Ankur Agarwal, holding brief of Sri Suyash Agarwal,learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Mahajan,learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
Sri Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner statesthat present writ petition has become infrcutuous and, therefore,it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.4.2022T.S.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue