Wtax/607/2019 Of Prema Pathak v. Principal Chief Commissioner Income Tax
High Court
20 May 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/607/2019 Of Prema Pathak v. Principal Chief Commissioner Income Tax
Date of order
20 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wtax/607/2019 Of Prema Pathak v. Principal Chief Commissioner Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Court No. - 35Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 607 of 2019Petitioner :- Prema PathakRespondent :- Principal Chief Commissioner Income TaxCounsel for Petitioner :- Aditya PandeyCounsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,Shubham Agarwal
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri Subham Agrawal, learnedcounsel for the respondents.
Petitioner has filed this writ petition against thenotice dated 28.03.2019 issued under Section 148of the I.T. Act. The petitioner is the widow oflate assessee.
Considering the above facts and circumstances,we allow the petitioner to file an objectionagainst the said notice before the authorityconcerned within a week from today. In case theobjection is filed, the authority concerned willdecide the same in accordance with law withinnext 15 day.
For a period of one month or till the objection of
the petitioner is decided, whichever is earlier, nocoercive action may be taken against thepetitioner.
The Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
A copy of this order be given to Sri SubhamAgrawal, learned Counsel for the respondentswithin 24 hours for communication andcompliance.
Order Date :- 20.5.2019Lbm/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue