Wtax/727/2022 Of Gaurav Sharma v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others
High Court
18 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/727/2022 Of Gaurav Sharma v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others
Date of order
18 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wtax/727/2022 Of Gaurav Sharma v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion onthe merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed on theground of alternative remedy, leaving it open to the petitioner toavail the statutory remedy of appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 727 of 2022
Petitioner :- Gaurav Sharma
Respondent :- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Ashish BansalCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Sri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel for the petitioner andSri Gaurav Mahajan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for therespondents.
Against the impugned assessment order dated 29.3.2022 for theassessment year 2013-14, the petitioner has alternative remedyof appeal under Section 246-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
In view of the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion onthe merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed on theground of alternative remedy, leaving it open to the petitioner toavail the statutory remedy of appeal.
Order Date :- 18.5.2022nd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue