Wtax/75/2022 Of Subodh Chandra Seth v. Income Tax Officer And 4 Others
High Court
30 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/75/2022 Of Subodh Chandra Seth v. Income Tax Officer And 4 Others
Date of order
30 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wtax/75/2022 Of Subodh Chandra Seth v. Income Tax Officer And 4 Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 75 of 2022
Petitioner :- Subodh Chandra SethRespondent :- Income Tax Officer And 4 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Suyash AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Gaurav Mahajan,Manu Ghildyal,Sudarshan Singh
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and SriManu Ghildyal, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
Learned counsel for the Income Tax Department has produced before usthe information received by the Assessing Authority through e-mail dated13.07.2019 from the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) UnitA-2, Mumbai, which prima facie indicates involvement of the petitioner inpenny stocks and shows that the petitioner has shown sale of penny stockof "M/s Tilak Venture Ltd." for Rs.1,06,13, 822/- during the Financial Year2014-15 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2015-16. The "information"produced before us by the learned counsel for the respondent Income TaxDepartment, has been returned to him in court, for returning to theauthority concerned.
Learned counsel for the petitioner now states that the petitioner wants toparticipate in reassessment proceedings and, therefore, this writ petitionmay be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner asstated, may participate in the reassessment proceedings.
Order Date :- 30.3.2022NLY
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.