Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/82/2017 Of Shiv Nath Gupta v. Commi...

Wtax/82/2017 Of Shiv Nath Gupta v. Commissioner Income Tax Allahabad Division Allahabad

High Court 11 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/82/2017 Of Shiv Nath Gupta v. Commissioner Income Tax Allahabad Division Allahabad
Date of order
11 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wtax/82/2017 Of Shiv Nath Gupta v. Commissioner Income Tax Allahabad Division Allahabad, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 82 of 2017 Petitioner :- Shiv Nath Gupta Respondent :- Commissioner, Income Tax, Allahabad Division, AllahabadCounsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh GuptaCounsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Praveen Kumar Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard Shri Rajesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitionerand Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the department. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner withthe below noted prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing theCommissioner, Income Tax, Allahabad Division, Allahabad to release theF.D.Rs/securities/Cash of the petitioner within limited time. II. Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice. III. Award the costs of this petition to the petitioner." A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent in whichit has been stated that the substantial portion of the prayers asmade by the petitioner has already been granted to him. Thepetitioner now contends that some Kisan Vikas Patras(K.V.Ps) remain to be released to him. Since the major portionof the prayers have been granted earlier, we leave it open tothe petitioner to approach the respondent by giving specificdetail of what remains. In case the petitioner files a representation/application within aperiod of one month from today, the same shall be decidedwithin a period of three months thereafter after giving anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition standsdisposed of.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan