Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/89/2022 Of Sanjiv Gupta v. Assissta...

Wtax/89/2022 Of Sanjiv Gupta v. Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others

High Court 21 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/89/2022 Of Sanjiv Gupta v. Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others
Date of order
21 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wtax/89/2022 Of Sanjiv Gupta v. Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counselfor the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawnaccordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 89 of 2022 Petitioner :- Sanjiv Gupta Respondent :- Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Rahul AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan,Krishna Agarawal Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Supplementary counter affidavit has been filed today, which istaken on record. Shri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and ShriGaurav Mahajan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for therespondent-Income Tax Department jointly state that theDepartment is taking appropriate action to resolve the issue. Learned counsel for the petitioner now states that in view of thefact that the Department is taking action to resolve the issue,therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn atthis stage. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counselfor the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawnaccordingly. Order Date :- 21.4.2022 SK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan