Wtax/897/2021 Of Dr. Om Prakash Gupta v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Allahabad And Another
High Court
06 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/897/2021 Of Dr. Om Prakash Gupta v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Allahabad And Another
Date of order
06 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wtax/897/2021 Of Dr. Om Prakash Gupta v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Allahabad And Another, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction uponthe respondent no.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 897 of 2021
Petitioner :- Dr. Om Prakash Gupta
Respondent :- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Allahabad And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanyukta SinghCounsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mahajan
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J.Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard Shri Sanyukta Singh, learned counsel for the petitionerand Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent.
Today, Shri Mahajan informed that the records have beenreconstructed and that appropriate order would be passed andany amount that may be refundable, would be paid within aperiod of one month.
In view of such statement made, no useful purpose would beserved in keeping the petition pending.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction uponthe respondent no. 2 to pass a final order with respect to therefund claimed by the petitioner for the A.Y. 1997-98 to 2003-04 within a period of one month from today such that anyamount refundable may be paid to the petitioner on or before 15January 2022.
Order Date :- 6.12.2021Saurabh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.