Case LawHigh Court › Wtax/94/2017 Of Vijay Vasudeva v. The Di...

Wtax/94/2017 Of Vijay Vasudeva v. The Director General Of Income-Taxinvestigation And Another

High Court 20 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Wtax/94/2017 Of Vijay Vasudeva v. The Director General Of Income-Taxinvestigation And Another
Date of order
20 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wtax/94/2017 Of Vijay Vasudeva v. The Director General Of Income-Taxinvestigation And Another, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 94 of 2017 Petitioner :- Vijay Vasudeva Respondent :- The Director General Of Income-Taxinvestigation And AnotherCounsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Garg,Ashish Bansal,Raj Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradip Kumar,Praveen Kumar Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Affidavits have been exchanged in this matter. The petitioner came before this Court withprayers stating that the bullion, which have beenseized from him on a certain date did not belongto him at all and belong to one Kashi OrnamentsHouse at Allahabad. His contention that he wasnot liable to any assessment against the saidbullion. A supplementary affidavit has been filed, whichcontains an order passed by the DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax Allahabad dated27.12.2018, which confers this factor. Therefore, the petitioners payers have virtuallybecome infructuous. Insofar as the seized goodsare concerned, it is always open to the person towhom the goods belong to apply for its release. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Nocosts. Order Date :- 20.2.2019S.P.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan