Case Law › High Court › X ==> v. Income Tax Officer

X ==> v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 10 Mar 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Mar 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In X ==> v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ZrWZyr‘oWM;HIGH COURT OF cHHATTlSGARHBILASPURIV.~Coram:-Hon’bIeSriDhirendraMihra-&.vv.Hon’ble Shri R.N. chanarasEr;i QTax Case(PRlNo.350512099,WShri snyam sumo} Agrawa:Prop.M/s.RadhaKishan (HUF),§I'Sprvicxe‘;Centre.P.O.Sakti.Districwanjgir‘3,5‘EWard-2(2):,IncomeTaxOmcar._,Bi_h$PUf(CG)K-I‘,‘l[a;]Shri Ankit singhal, counsel for the appeilant.Oral Order_Q7QK(Passed on 10of March, 201mHeardonLA.No.0112010,applicationr appeal. forwithdrawal of the—.2)'‘appealVLeamedcounself0![theappellant submitsthatther imsgnthas become infructuous with ths lapse of time.3)InViewof the‘above?LA, Nam/2010lsallowed.counse!fortheappellantis permittedto withdrawtheappeal.Learned4)Accordingly,theappeal is dismissed\\L‘\j as Mthdraw.n‘Sd/~’Kg "'MISHRAIf/Judge',JI

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.