Case Law › High Court › Xcommissioner[Of][ Income][ Tax,]Bilaspu...

Xcommissioner[Of][ Income][ Tax,]Bilaspur v. Dents

High Court 01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Xcommissioner[Of][ Income][ Tax,]Bilaspur v. Dents, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

WEFORE [ HON’BLE][ HIGH][ COURT][ OF][ CHHATTISGARH]AT BILASPUR TAX CASE[ No.][ /£w/“Q/2é67/] APPELLANT / ,xCommissioner[of][ Income][ Tax,]Bilaspur VERSUS DENTS RESPON ’Smt. Devi Bai Nathani,LegalRepresentativeofLateShriSheetal‘DasNathani,Ashok Bus[ Service,][ Bilaspur] Income Tax[ Appellate][ Tribunal,]Jabalpur[Bech,]a‘Jabalpur. T (Al [ THE][ INCOME][ TAX][ AC] APPEAL [ SEC.][ 2%] A/TV’ a;é/c XI-HQ—78W mgLc m mw (WEI) 11a 200?

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.