Yogendra Babu Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh
High Court
11 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Yogendra Babu Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Date of order
11 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Yogendra Babu Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, thepresent writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to takerecourse to the law if aggrieved by the said closure report.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 333 of 2023
Yogendra Babu Sharma S/o Late R.K. Sharma Aged About 56 Years R/oQuarter Type-V No.04, Gpra Income Tax Colony Bharat Nagar Shahpura,District Bhopal 462039 (M.P.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1.State of Chhattisgarh Through The Director General Police, PoliceDepartment Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, ChhattisgarhDepartment Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2.The Superintendent of Police District Raipur (C.G.)
3.The Station House Officer Police Station Kotwali, District : Raipur,Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner: Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate Mr. Sachin Nidhi, AdvocateFor State/Respondents: Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice11.08.2023
1.Heard Mr. Y.C. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Sachin Nidhi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. MadhunishaSingh, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for theState/respondents.
2.The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with thefollowing prayers:
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleasedto direct the Respondent Police Authority to expedite thefree & fair investigation, arrest the accused and file thecharge-sheet within a specific time period of one month,as per the provision of law.
10.2. Any other relief/ order may also be granted thatmay be deemed fit and just in the facts andcircumstances of the case.”
3.Learned State counsel submits that as per instruction received byhim, investigation in the present case has been concluded and closurereport has filed before the competent Court.
4.In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, thepresent writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to takerecourse to the law if aggrieved by the said closure report.
Sd/- Sd/-(Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
(Sanjay Agrawal)
(Ramesh Sinha)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.